How WebMD convinces us we’re dying
(Daniel Acker - BLOOMBERG NEWS)
We’ve all, at some point, likely done it: Felt under the weather, Googled the symptoms and, moments later, become convinced that it could be a life-threatening illness. Sixty percent of Americans, after all, get health care information online. New research in this month’s Psychological Science sheds some light on why, exactly, reading a description of brain cancer might quickly convince us we have it.
In the study, psychologists created a fictional thyroid cancer and had subjects read descriptions of its symptoms. Some had the very general symptoms, things like fatigue and weight fluctuation, grouped together at the start. Others had those general symptoms interspersed with more specific problems such as a lump on the neck.
What they found was those that went through the general symptoms first were more likely to self-diagnose themselves with cancer..
The researchers think the phenomenon similar to what they call a “gambler’s fallacy,” where a streak of good cards irrationally convinces a gambler he’s more likely to continue winning. Except in this case, a streak of confirmed symptoms irrationally convinces the Web surfer he has cancer.
If anything, the study authors hope their work will give sites like WebMD a reason to consider restructuring how they present information.
“According to our findings, if the goal is to encourage people to seek medical attention, symptoms should be presented in a short list of general symptoms grouped together,” they conclude. If, however, the goal is to halt online hypochondria, the authors suggest taking the exact opposite approach and that “alternating specific and general symptoms is desirable.”
(h/t: Britt Peterson)
- Spam
- Obscene
- Duplicate
Blog Contributors
Ezra Klein

Ezra Klein is the editor of Wonkblog and a columnist at the Washington Post, as well as a contributor to MSNBC and Bloomberg. His work focuses on domestic and economic policymaking, as well as the political system that’s constantly screwing it up. He really likes graphs, and is on Twitter, Google+ and Facebook. E-mail him here.
Neil Irwin

Neil Irwin is a Washington Post columnist and the economics editor of Wonkblog. Each weekday morning his Econ Agenda column reports and explains the latest trends in economics, finance, and the policies that shape both. He is the author of “The Alchemists: Three Central Bankers and a World on Fire.” Follow him on Twitter here. Email him here.
Sarah Kliff

Sarah Kliff covers health policy, focusing on Medicare, Medicaid and the health reform law. She tries to fit in some reproductive health and education policy coverage, too, alongside an occasional hockey reference. Her work has appeared in Newsweek, Politico, and the BBC. She is on Twitter and Facebook.
Brad Plumer

Brad Plumer is a reporter focusing on energy and environmental issues. He was previously an associate editor at The New Republic. Follow him on Twitter. Email him here.
Dylan Matthews

Dylan Matthews covers taxes, poverty, campaign finance, higher education, and all things data. He has also written for The New Republic, Salon, Slate, and The American Prospect. Follow him on Twitter here. Email him here.











Loading...
Comments